orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? (Orphean)
by Bert 
, Monday, June 04, 2007, 12:15 (6170 days ago) @ angeloitacare
Angelo,
what negative consequences do you think would imply following this rool?
None, you can't go wrong for the lowest crossover frequency if you work around that way.
Bert
--
BD-Design - Only the Best!
Complete thread:
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - angeloitacare, 2007-06-04, 06:29
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - Bert, 2007-06-04, 09:13
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - PeterSt., 2007-06-04, 09:28
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - angeloitacare, 2007-06-04, 12:04
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - Bert, 2007-06-04, 12:15
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - Ivo, 2007-06-04, 13:46
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - angeloitacare, 2007-06-04, 14:34
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - Don Reid, 2007-06-04, 17:13
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - angeloitacare, 2007-06-04, 17:40
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - robmatthew, 2007-06-06, 15:55
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - angeloitacare, 2007-06-06, 17:36
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - robmatthew, 2007-06-06, 23:10
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - angeloitacare, 2007-06-06, 17:36
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - robmatthew, 2007-06-06, 15:55
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - angeloitacare, 2007-06-04, 17:40
- orphean for 220hz high-pass not too small ? - angeloitacare, 2007-06-04, 12:04
- Tweak - PeterSt., 2007-06-25, 01:44
- the pic does not give any clue (nt*)
![[ [ No text ] ]](themes/default/images/no_text.png "Empty posting / no text")
- angeloitacare, 2007-06-27, 01:34
- the pic does not give any clue (nt*)