Twindac+ and Django (BD-Design)
If so, wouldn't it be even better if the output trafo of the twindac was itself a volume control, i.e. a trafo with many selectable outputs? You would spare a trafo in the signal chain which should result in even better signal quality. What do you think about this?
Hi Wolfgang,
I discussed this with the designer of the TwinDAC+ because it seems a good idea. Less is more!
In reality it seems in this situation that things will be worse. Here is what he wrote to me:
"I do not think that will work, as you have to load the DAC in a correct way. Furthermore, you will change the winding ratio with each tap on the DAC transformer, which will have other negative effects on other parameters.
It is actually not a good idea to attenuate the tiny signal at the source. The output transformer acts as a passive pre-amp and the attenuation should be done on the amplified signal."
Ciao,
Bert
--
BD-Design - Only the Best!
Complete thread:
- Twindac+ and Django - dr.cube, 2006-09-19, 17:22
- Twindac+ and Django - Bert, 2006-09-20, 09:22
- Twindac+ and Django - dr.cube, 2006-09-20, 11:50
- Twindac+ and Django - PeterSt., 2006-09-20, 11:59
- Twindac+ and Django - Bert, 2006-09-20, 12:09
- Twindac+ and Django - dr.cube, 2006-09-20, 13:09
- Twindac+ and Django - Bert, 2006-09-20, 13:55
- Twindac+ and Django - unknown, 2006-09-20, 14:51
- Twindac+ and Django - dr.cube, 2006-09-20, 18:42
- Twindac+ and Django - unknown, 2006-09-21, 14:14
- Twindac+ and Django - dr.cube, 2006-09-20, 18:42
- Twindac+ and Django - dr.cube, 2006-09-20, 13:09
- Twindac+ and Django - dr.cube, 2006-09-20, 11:50
- Twindac+ and Django - Bert, 2006-09-20, 09:22