why not 3rd LPF order? (BD-Design)

by GC, Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 08:11 (6814 days ago) @ GC

Hi Kohjin,

I've been curious why Bert and others don't use 3rd order LPF which
produces in-phase operation.

I've been always curious why people rely more on theory and simulations than listening to what they hear... although, you never know if things improve.

So, do try and if it sounds better then report back.

Ciao,

Bert

Tags:
0

locked

3386 views

Complete thread:

RSS Feed of thread

filter values - GC, 2005-08-25, 23:10
- filter values - GC, 2005-08-28, 10:07
  - filter values - GC, 2005-08-28, 10:18
    - filter values - GC, 2005-08-28, 19:17
- filter values - GC, 2005-08-29, 11:23
  - filter values - GC, 2005-08-29, 17:02
    - filter values - GC, 2005-08-29, 17:28
      - why not 3rd LPF order? - GC, 2005-08-30, 01:48
        why not 3rd LPF order? - GC, 2005-08-30, 08:11
        why not 3rd LPF order? - GC, 2005-08-30, 22:10
        
        Some more info... - GC, 2005-08-31, 00:06
- filter values - GC, 2005-09-02, 16:41