Mac vs Windows, now we know.... (BD-Design)
Hi Brian,
...are you sure both should be max priority? I read somewhere that there
was a bug in Foobar and one of the settings had to be just short of max?
I downloaded foobar a few days ago (full version) and with both settings to max seems to work well (now). At least when I check through the task manager (CTRL-ALT-DEL) then foobar is set to real-time. Before this was not the case so I guess they must have fixed that bug...
BTW, did you set the file buffer (playback settings screen) to a value higher than the tracks you play (250.000kB is more than enough for most tracks).
Ciao,
Bert
Complete thread:
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-10, 20:32
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-11, 00:01
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-11, 01:01
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-11, 23:22
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-12, 00:13
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-12, 20:55
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-12, 21:18
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-24, 23:06
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-25, 09:48
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-05-12, 13:14
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-05-12, 15:03
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-05-13, 00:24
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-24, 23:06
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-12, 21:18
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-12, 20:55
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-12, 00:13
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-11, 23:22
- Additional hardware configuration... - GC, 2005-07-04, 12:15
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-11, 01:01
- Mac vs Windows, now we know.... - GC, 2005-04-11, 00:01